| Viewpoints
of the |
Appollinarians |
Nestorians |
Eutychians |
| Proponents |
Apollinarius, bishop of Laodicea
Justin Martyr |
Represented by Nestorius, 5th
century bishop of Constantinople |
Represented by Eutychians
Theodosius II |
| Time |
4th century |
5th century |
5th century |
| Denial |
Completeness of humanity |
Unity of person |
Distinction of natures |
| Explanation |
The divine Logos took the place of the
human mind. |
Union was moral, not organic-thus two
persons. The human was completely controlled by the
divine. |
Monophysirist; the human nature was
swallowed by the divine to create a new third natures - a
tertium quid. |
| Condemned |
Council of Antioch, A.D. 378,379
Council of Constantinople A.D. 381 |
Synod of Ephesus A.D. 431 |
Concil of Chalcedon, A.D. 405; defended
by "Robber Synod" of Ephesus, A.D. 449;
Condemned by Chalcedon, A.D. 451 |
| Associated with |
Logos=reason in all people |
"Word-flesh" (Antiochene) not
"word-man" (Alexandirian) Christology; opposed
to using theotokos of Mary. |
Concern for the unity and divinity of
Christ; Alexandrian (minimized humanity) |
| Argument for |
Affirmed Christ's deity and real
humanness |
Distinguished human Jesus, who died,
from Divine Son, who cannot die. |
Maintained the unity of Christ's person. |
| Argument against |
If Christ did not have a human mind, he
would not be truly human (Heb.2:14; 1 John 4:1-3) |
If the death of Jesus was the act of a
human person, not of God, it could not be efficacious
(Rev. 1:12-18) |
If Christ were neither a man nor God, he
could not redeem as or as God (Phil. 2:6) |
| Major opponents |
Vitalis
Pope Damascus
Basil, Theodosius Gregory of Nazianzen Gregory of Nyssa |
Cyril of Alexandira |
Flavian of Constantinople Pope Leo
Theodoret
Eusebius of Dorylaeum |